What AI teacher evaluation software is and what it should and shouldn't do: how it drafts rubric-aligned write-ups in minutes while the evaluator keeps the judgment, the privacy and defensibility questions to ask, and how to choose the right tool.
AI can cut a teacher evaluation in half, but which half? The watching (human judgment) must stay human; the writing (rubric translation) is what AI can safely do. Why that line is the whole question, and why the write-up tool you pick still matters.
How Arizona teacher evaluation works: local control (no single state framework), what the state still requires, and which Danielson edition and scale your district uses, plus where AI helps with the write-up and where judgment stays human.
West Virginia's Distinguished is not Danielson's Distinguished. The seven standards, the sixteen elements, why Accomplished is the expected norm, and the honest scope of where AI, such as EvalScribe, helps a WV evaluator's write-up.